What would you call a party if the majority of it turns into RINO? Isn’t the name of it (and all it used to represent) is a misnomer? I mean, does it make sense to proclaim betrayal of party principles if the act became massive and these principles are now mentioned as “far-right” outliers?
First it was everybody’s darling Christie, applauded for his anti-union efforts – until his sucking up to Oh’Bummer in the aftermath of hurricane Sandy brought to light investigations into his stance on other issues. For the record, I’ll say I got disappointed in him ever since it was pointed out to me how his promotion of Islamic expansion into this country exactly repeats nauseating attitude of liberals.
Just recent examples – Hagel – of “Jewish lobby”, &&&’ infamy. And now Rubio , on immigration. Rubio, who less than a few months ago was considered a world-class political talent with the ability to lead the party into the 21st century , and who now proposes same tired stack of Dem’s
immigration amnesty cards under Republican header.
Who was there laughing at the prospect of the End of the World? Still think everything’s fine around us?